[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4834) DN matching rules should be indexed

Howard Chu writes:
> That's a good idea but would require more work to define indexer
> functions for each matching rule before we could do anything further.

I was thinking to only support it for existing indexer functions.
Would 'index cn :caseExactMatch' require a new indexer function?

> My reason for posting this ITS is that we already have the index
> available for the DN relativeMatch rules, so we should be taking
> advantage of them.

Fair enough.