[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: (ITS#4834) DN matching rules should be indexed
On Feb 8, 2007, at 2:51 AM, hyc@symas.com wrote:
> h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
>> Suggestion: Generalize a bit and support the slapd.conf statement
>>
>> index attr :matchingRule
>>
>> Can be used with the extended filter (attr:matchingRule:=foo),
>> or with e.g. (attr=foo) when matchingRule is the EQUALITY rule.
>>
> That's a good idea but would require more work to define indexer
> functions
> for each matching rule before we could do anything further. My
> reason for
> posting this ITS is that we already have the index available for
> the DN
> relativeMatch rules, so we should be taking advantage of them.
I note that dn2id is only useful for entryDN matching. For
matching of arbitrary DN attributes, additional indexing would
be needed. It may be possible/reasonable to integrate indexing
for this with component matching indexing... which, of course,
needs work.
-- Kurt
>
> --
> -- Howard Chu
> Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
> Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
> Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
>
>