[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#4659) Core dump after MOD
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> --On Friday, September 01, 2006 1:40 AM +0200 Pierangelo Masarati
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I note that HEAD & re24 radically differ in this area; that specific
>>> assertion does no longer exist, and the signaling to the writewaiters is
>>> much more lightweight. Could it be related to sucking in an incomplete
>>> or inconsistent set of diffs?
>> Always possible, but I don't think so...
>> That specific assertion looks like it exists to me.
> correct, the code differs in many points, but that logic didn't change.
> I'm trying to figure out if and how, in the close procedure for
> connections, there's any guarantee that a pending write is definitely
> tried and completed before actually closing, and who and if, in this
> case, resets the value of c_writewaiter.
We found that Quanah was missing some relevant patches in daemon.c that
would affect the servicing of a pending write. I would put this on the
back burner until we see if the new patches resolve the issue.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/