Re: (ITS#4589) syncrepl DELs sometimes don't propagate

[hyc@symas.com]

hyc@symas.com wrote:
> pratt@cs.utk.edu wrote:
>   
>> richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Something not quite right with session log or nonpresent list or.......
>>>
>>> Pretty much the same as the last time I played the syncrepl game, except this
>>> time instead of entries missing from the slave, there are excessive entries on
>>> the slave.
>>>     
>>>       
>> Yes, I can reproduce this problem as well. At a cursory glance it
>> appears to be a sessionlog issue as the problem disappears if I disable
>> the sessionlog. Can provide additional info if needed.
>>
>>   
>>     
> I've been able to reproduce this problem with an optimized build, 
> setting syncprov-sessionlog 2. In this case, single deletes after the 
> first don't get sent by syncprov. However, with a non-optimized debug 
> build, the problem doesn't occur. I may have a buggy optimizer here (gcc 
> 4.0.2). What compiler versions are you using, and can you try with a 
> non-optimized syncprov overlay?
>
>   
This is now fixed in HEAD, slapd/ldapsync.c  rev 1.34


-- 
  -- Howard Chu
  Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
  Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
  OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/