Re: refreshAndPersist vs. refreshOnly and the ...4302.. control (ITS#4317)

[uwe@intrameta.com]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

>>I am trying to run a syncrepl, using the refreshAndPersist option, but the
>>following error endlessly repeated on the master:
>>
>>slap_global_control: unavailable control: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.9.1.1
>>
>>When I switch the backup config type to "refreshOnly", the syncrepl seems to
>>work fine.
>>    
>>
>
>This is not an error; in fact, it's logged as "trace".  Slapd is simply noting
>that there is no knowledge of how to handle that control globally, so it's going
>to delegate the database that will be selected to honor the request.
>
>If you switch to a more "sane" logging you won't notice it.  If you're
>unfamiliar with how playing with logging in slapd, see the "loglevel" directive
>in slapd.conf(5) and the "-d" switch in slapd(8).
>
>p.
>
>  
>
Thanks, I'll explore changing the log level. However, the error/trace 
message is misleading - it would be better to clearly flag it as a trace 
message (and possibly update the docs on how the controls behave)

Thanks
Uwe