[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#3781)

On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 07:21 +0000, quanah@stanford.edu wrote:
> --On Thursday, November 24, 2005 11:25 PM +0100 Pierangelo Masarati 
> <ando@sys-net.it> wrote:
> This is linked to ITS#4211 I think.  back-relay and slapo-rwm have no 
> back-config support, so I don't see any way to use them to do rewrites for 
> the replicated cn=config stuff I've been trying on the replica side.

It works just fine when you start with -f instead of -F, so basically
the idea is good, we just need to be patient.  Unfortunately back-config
support is not on of my priorities, especially in that area, because I'm
getting close to production with a project that needs that stuff, and it
works as is so I don't dare getting too much involved in its reorking
right now.  After that, slapo-rwm will need some extensive memory
handling rework to fix ITS#3971 as well; I think in that case it'll be
time to complete the overlay, and it'll be trivial to fix back-relay,
since there's just one statement to configure.

I guess you know how the order of priorities could be changed :)