[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#4161) Op. attrs. numSubordinates / numAllSubordinates
Howard Chu wrote:
> The other issue which I recall was raised the last time
> this suggestion was made, (and the reason we decided to only implement
> the hasSubordinates attribute) is that there was neither a formal
> specification nor an ad hoc standard defining the semantics of the
> numSubordinates attribute. Some vendors treated it only as the one-level
> count, while others treated it as the subtree count.
Every entry in the DIT MAY have a numSubordinates operational attribute
the contents of which indicate how many immediate subordinates that
Don't have a more recent copy of the draft.