[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: (ITS#4121) cosine.schema fixes

At 09:33 PM 10/28/2005, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>--On Friday, October 28, 2005 9:28 PM -0700 "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> wrote:
>>At 05:47 PM 10/28/2005, quanah@stanford.edu wrote:
>>>Full_Name: Quanah Gibson-Mount
>>>Version: HEAD
>>>OS: Solaris
>>>URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/
>>>Submission from: (NULL) (
>>>Various objectClasses in cosine.schema incorrectly refer to
>>>"streetAddress" instead of "street".
>>>They are:
>>>domain (it is listed twice in the MAY portion)
>>>Also, the commented bit about streetAddress itself
>>All of this is as intended.
>>If and when draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-xx.txt is published
>>as a Standards Track RFC obsoleting RFC 1274, I'll update
>>the definitions.  Until then, I think they should be left
>>as is.  I wouldn't want to presume that the IESG will
>>approve my I-D as recommended, especially before IETF
>>wide Last Call.
>Okay, just seemed odd when I was looking through the schema for some other stuff. ;)
>Even "streetAddress" being listed twice in the domain objectClass is deliberate?

Yes.  IIRC, this goes back to how the attribute set was
defined originally.