[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3964) test041 with ldbm - ldapsearch failed (32)!
I didn't notice that (haven't been compiling or testing with ldbm for a
while). The way back-ldbm tests for disclose access to the search base is
not consistent with the way the same test is performed by back-bdb/hdb.
They should give the same result, though; the problem lies in how ACIs
(and, I suspect, the dynacl API) handle the last argument of
access_allowed_mask(). This has been already noted in ITS#3963, and will
likely need some development and reworking of ACIs. In the meanwhile, I
suspect I need to disable all "disclose" checking from test041. In any
case, it appears test041 was worth implementing, though :).
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497