[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3845) support for SASL binds with plaintext rootpw
Maybe it wasn't clear... but I'm referring to a DN which is the
updatedn and rootdn of the replica, not the rootdn of the master. In
general you don't want the rootdn of the master to have the ability
to modify a replica so that changes always come from slurpd, right?
On Jul 7, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Howard Chu wrote:
> Well, the patch is fine (I'd add a descriptive comment to it) but
> in general, slurpd should not be binding with the rootdn.
> We can probably add this to HEAD/RE23; I'm not sure it's eligible
> for RE22.