[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3671) disconnecting a syncrepl consumer deadlocks the provider
On Thursday 28 April 2005 12:26, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2005 00:10, Howard Chu wrote:
> > This is now fixed in HEAD, although some further discussion about
> > the queueing behavior may be warranted.
> I just tested HEAD again. Now it shows a different behaviour. The
> first ldapadd that I started after pulling the network plug still
> stops progressing after a few entries. The improvement is that the
> provider keeps processing search requests and addtional add request
> (only the first ldapadd is locked).
> On the downside the (locked) ldapadd didn't resume operation after I
> reconnected the network cable. I tried to stop the consumer then and
> this made the provider crash with the following backtrace:
Well I have to correct myself a bit it doesn't really crash, but runs
into an assertion:
lt-slapd: connection.c:634: connection_destroy: Assertion
`c->c_writewaiter == 0' failed.