[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3609) ch_malloc of 8388608 bytes failed
Thanks for your comments. The threads setting is at 4.
I guess I'll stick with bdb, but switch to 4.2.52 (with patches).
On 3/30/2005 5:53 PM, Howard Chu wrote:
> I do not recommend reducing the size of the searchstack. Instead,
> decrease the maximum number of threads from the default of 16 to
> something much lower. The fact that your backtrace only shows one thread
> running is probably just an artifact of the debugging environment not
> being able to get full status information after a fatal exception. This
> frequently happens if the gdb binary was compiled against a different
> version of libc headers than you're currently running under. At any
> rate, the lack of information about other threads is not a reliable
> indicator of the program's actual thread state.
> The back-ldbm backend has lower memory requirements but is not
> recommended for any deployments because it has locking and stability
> firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> No sooner had I configured <slapd.conf> as described below and then
>> tested it exactly as before, did it crash again. This time I ran
>> thread apply all bt full
>> but apparently there was only one thread running. As before, I put
>> all this onto my web site at
>> Any suggestions you can make as to different values for these
>> parameters or other parameters, please let me know. Also, I'd be
>> willing to try a less memory-hungry backend if you think that'll help.
Bob Smith - email@example.com - http://www.sudleyplace.com
a.k.a. firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.qualitas.com