[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3524) libldap multiple select() without reinitializing FD_SETs
I don't know of an implementation handling it different than you described.
Just various docs point out that timeout should be considered undefined and
reinitialized after select returned with EINTR. But I am fine with leaving
the timeout untouched.
On Friday 28 January 2005 18:53, Kurt@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
> I know of no implementation of select(2) which increases
> the timeout. Some leave it alone. Others decrease it
> by the amount waited. When they do, we take advantage
> of that. If they don't, oh well.
> My question is, does anyone know of an implementation
> where the code behaves in an ill maner (e.g., beyond the