[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: (ITS#3425) HEAD fails to replicate newer provider entries over older repliac entries
Howard Chu wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
>> OK, I see. The provider is doing the right thing. The consumer is
>> failing to update the entry. It receives the new entry from the
>> provider and searches for an existing entry with the same entryUUID.
>> Since you have recreated the entry on the provider, the entryUUID no
>> longer matches the one on the consumer. The consumer finds no match,
>> and then tries to Add the target entry, but then gets "Already
>> Exists" because an entry with the same DN does exist, and it stops at
>> that point. Will patch the consumer soon.
> Nope, that wasn't it. The consumer is already fixed to address this
> possibility, and my own tests showed that the patched consumer works
> as intended. Not sure what's going on in your trace. Is the consumer
> running an up to date build?
It was the consumer after all. I've patched that and extended test018 to
exercise this behavior.
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support