Re: (ITS#3395) rw-overlay is not rewriting

[ando@sys-net.it]

dieter@dkluenter.de wrote:

>Hello Ando,
>
>"Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it> writes:
>
>  
>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>"Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it> writes:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>It works if you use the correct syntax, i.e. prefix all statements with
>>>>rwm-, e.g.
>>>>
>>>>overlay rwm
>>>>rwm-suffixmassage <real naming context>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>As I had read your mail, thit was my first configuration, but that
>>>failed as reported
>>>      
>>>
>
>  
>
>>in your initial bug report, the "rwm-" was missing.  I confirm a
>>configuration with
>>
>>overlay rwm
>>suffixmassage "<vnc>" "<rnc>"
>>    
>>
>
>I agree that I missed to mention that I had tried with
>'rwm-suffixmassage' as well. But I had tested various configuration
>options that evening and only the reported was successfull.
>
>I have now tested with a monday evening cvs update and can confirm,
>that the following configuration is properly working
>  
>
Now it should work in all three cases (with the previously highlighted 
penalty when the overlay is explicitly instantiated but the legacy 
statements without the "rwm-" prefix are used).  Ciao, Thanks for 
spotting the problem, though.  Ciao, Ando.





    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497