[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Very difficult search for gidNumber and others (ITS#3195)
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:30:12PM +0200, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> The software works as expected, this is not a bug. If you need substring
> match, use attribute types with substring match, or define your own.
Thanks for the explanation. I've taken this issue to the RFC2307 author.
If I happen to change my schema and use another definition, one that would
allow at least for ">=" type comparisons, would openldap support it in versions 2.1.x?
If not, in what version?