[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: SASL causes segmentation fault (ITS#3172)
--On Wednesday, June 09, 2004 10:11 AM -0700 "Kurt D. Zeilenga"
> At 09:03 AM 6/9/2004, email@example.com wrote:
>> There are two segfaults in this email. What segfault I get, and where,
>> depends entirely on the order in which I start the replica's. Whee!
> It's not clear to me that this new segfault is related
> to the vget_next segfault. I suggest you open a new
> ITS for this issue. I note that this new backtrace
> appears to be truncated.
Okay, I can certainly do that.
What *really* puzzles me, is I can recreate either of these two segfaults,
repeatedly, just entirely based on the order in which I start the ldap
replica's. Is that bizarre or what? :)
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html