[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: New substring matching rule (ITS#3041)
At 08:11 AM 3/29/2004, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Le vendredi 26 Mars 2004 17:55, Kurt D. Zeilenga a écrit :
>> Without a formal technical specification (e.g., an RFC), your
>> new rule addition is likely will not be accepted.
This is my key point.
If anything, the addition of only a substring rule confused me
(instead of addition of a set of similar equality, ordering, and
substrings matching rules). It makes little sense to me to add a
new substring rule in absence of an equality rule of like semantics.
But these confusion on this or other aspects of your submission
seem beyond my key point. That is, I think a technical specification
is needed here.