Re: segfault in ldap_back_search() with ENABLE_REWRITE (ITS#2825)

[ftr@highstreetnetworks.com]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

>I suggest this patch for OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_1 and next 2.1 release.
>
>ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/its-2825.patch
>
>Ando.
>  
>
Why do you say that it should not happen ??
Is it not allowed to do SASL bind on subordinate back-ldap ?  Am I doing 
something wrong ?
What about filterstr ? it too is passed as NULL by slap_sasl2dn() and 
derefenenced unconditionally.

-- 
Tom Riddle
HighStreet Networks
www.highstreetnetworks.com