[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: back-<shell/tcl> abandon needs mutex (ITS#2564)

At 07:30 AM 6/2/2003, h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no wrote:
>Sorry, I don't know why I said back-tcl.  back-tcl is fine.
>BTW, and another solution for back-shell would be to not
>send the pid to the abandon process, though that probably
>makes back-shell abandon pretty useless.

Yes, I think the best solution is just to axe back-shell
abandon.  Kurt