[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Bug with pid in back-shell abandon (ITS#2519)

Kurt Zeilenga writes:
> I have no problem with this fix or, alternatively, removing
> abandon support from back-shell.

Hmm... I'd like to reinstate abandon to work properly, but since the
part about killing the process if no abandon is defined has been gone
for a year, maybe it's not a good idea to reinstate it now.
People kan run their own process with does a kill if necessary.