[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: BDB Index corruption (ITS#2323)
Howard Chu wrote:
>This may have been fixed for ITS#2368. Can you test that?
I Will try. I never developed a testsuite for this bug and switched back
to ldbm (where I
am bitten by the ch_malloc-trying-to-allocate-my-memory bug :-( ) so I
am not absolutely
sure I can reproduce the problem without running my production system
but I will try. The
description in 2368 certainly fits my situation.... I just got bits here
in SFO. Are you here
already for the IETF or will you only get here for the developers day?