[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: 2.1.1-BETA schema problems
At 02:39 PM 2002-04-26, Andrew Davison wrote:
>but getting back to the 2.1. schema files. back in the old days (2.0.23)
>'surname' declared it was SUP from 'name' and there actually was a
>definition for 'name'. in 2.1 i can't find it. is there now a secret core schema that we can only guess at?
System schema is defined in code and published in the subschema.
All operational attributes, as well a select few user attributes
(including 'name'), are considered system schema.