[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: one-level search error? (ITS#1654)



This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D4AF.B9FF82E0
Content-Type: text/plain

It's good to hear that v.2.1 will have tackled this problem, but can you say
anything at this moment about when this version is due to come out?

Also, are you willing to provide us with the information about which
source-file contains the error? One of our programmers has offered to have a
look himself to fix it in the 2.0.x version.

Thank you.
Wim Peters.


> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van:	Pierangelo Masarati [SMTP:openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org]
> Verzonden:	maandag 25 maart 2002 9:57
> Aan:	wpeters@abz.nl
> Onderwerp:	Re: one-level search error? (ITS#1654)
> 
> The problem has been definitely overcome in 2.1 (or HEAD) code, where
> the DN normalization has been completely rewritten. The four backslashes
> in the DN, which correspond to two escaped backslashes (e.g. 
> 
> dn: ou=\\\\
> 
> implies
> 
> ou: \\
> 
> ) are incorrectly translated into three backslashes, so your base dn 
> doesn't result in any match.  I'll see if it's worth fixing it before
> 2.1 is released.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D4AF.B9FF82E0
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
RE: one-level search error? (ITS#1654) 

It's good to hear = that v.2.1 will have tackled this problem, but can you say anything at = this moment about when this version is due to come out?

Also, are you = willing to provide us with the information about which source-file = contains the error? One of our programmers has offered to have a look = himself to fix it in the 2.0.x version.

Thank you. 
Wim Peters. 

-----Oorspronkelijk = bericht----- 
Van:    = Pierangelo Masarati = [SMTP:openldap-its@OpenLDAP.org] 
Verzonden:      = maandag 25 maart 2002 9:57 
Aan:    = wpeters@abz.nl 
Onderwerp:      = Re: one-level search error? = (ITS#1654) 

The problem has been definitely = overcome in 2.1 (or HEAD) code, where 
the DN normalization has been = completely rewritten. The four backslashes 
in the DN, which correspond to two = escaped backslashes (e.g. 

dn: ou=3D\\\\ 

implies 

ou: \\ 

) are incorrectly translated into = three backslashes, so your base dn 
doesn't result in any match.  = I'll see if it's worth fixing it before 
2.1 is released. 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1D4AF.B9FF82E0--