Re: index corruption (1164) still present in 2.0.15 with db 3.1.17 (ITS#1359)

[leifj@it.su.se]

[ATTACHMENT TRIMMED - Available via http://www.openldap.org/its/]

On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> It was done yesterday...

I will try that! I have some additional information. Attached you
will find my slapd.log for one of the session which creates the index
corruption. I am not sure it makes a difference but I saw messages
from idl in it. The modifications I make are of the form

changetype: modify
replace: uidNumber
uidNumber: <uid>
-
replace: gidNumber
gidNumber: <gid>

... etc etc etc ...

replace: objectClass
objectClass: <old objectClasses -- yes I know I should "add" ... >
objectClass: posixAccount

Are the messages from idl signifficant?

Another interesting fact is that it is not always the case that the 
entries beeing modified are the ones which are affected by the index 
corruption!

	Cheers Leif