[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: index corruption problem (ITS#1349)
> Markus.Storm@mediaWays.net wrote:
> > Some more info:
> > I think we tracked it down to a script of ours that does a
> > modrdn on "uid=testuser". At times there are multiple instances
> > of this script running.
> > Is modrdn threading-safe ?
> It should. One problem of that function is it is not transactional.
> This means that a failure between a certain set of operations will
> leave the dn and the index spaces in a dangling state. I've been
> working on that for a while, but as the problem will be outdated
> by back-bdb and modrdn should be considered an administrative
> operation, to be performed with extra care, I didn't go too deep
> into it. Can you detail to what extent the multiple instances of
> the entry coexist? I mean, do they show up when looking for
> a(n indexed) value they share or when dumping (ldapsearch or slapcat)
> the db?
All existant entries always showed up when querying for the value they
share. None of them was ever missing.
But this query was slow. It was about the same speed as if querying for
a non-indexed attribute (sorry I didn't trace slapd at the time so I
cannot say for sure whether it was searching id2entry).
Another strange occurrence was the following:
All the entries that share this value live in different subtrees, i.e.
there's just one entry with this value per subtree.
We were querying for the shared value, but using the subtree root as a
search base, so there should have only been one result.
Instead, slapd returned this entry (but none of those in the other subtrees)
Sorry I cannot provide you with any traces. We didn't have the time to
analyze things when they happened.
Maybe writing a script that does concurrent MODRDNs can reproduce
our situation ?