[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Performance/lber (ITS#639)
Thanks for the suggestion.
I believe the ber_dup is leftover from when prior API I-D
constification requirements, which have been dropped.
I've reverted the code to the prior implementation and
added a comment regarding assumptions made.
At 08:57 PM 7/26/00 +0000, email@example.com wrote:
>Full_Name: Zachary Amsden
>Submission from: (NULL) (188.8.131.52)
>Gets rid of using ber_dup is ber_peek_tag