Re: Performance/lber (ITS#639)

[Kurt@OpenLDAP.org]

Thanks for the suggestion.

I believe the ber_dup is leftover from when prior API I-D
constification requirements, which have been dropped.
I've reverted the code to the prior implementation and
added a comment regarding assumptions made.

        Kurt

At 08:57 PM 7/26/00 +0000, zach@mirapoint.com wrote:
>Full_Name: Zachary Amsden
>Version: 2.0
>OS: FreeBSD
>URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/zach-lber-decode-000626.patch
>Submission from: (NULL) (208.48.74.2)
>
>
>Gets rid of using ber_dup is ber_peek_tag