[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Schema violations not caught (ITS#398)
> Okay, here is the scoop with regard to OpenLDAP 1.2. An undefined
> objectclass is treated as requiring no attributes and allowing all
> attributes. That is, an undefined objectlass behaves much like
> the LDAPv3 extensibleObject objectclass.
> This will likely not be changed in OpenLDAP 1.x to maintained
> backwards compatibility with U-Mich 3.3. It's likely something
> worth discussing in regards to 2.0 development (on the devel
> list please).
OK, I'll check out the discussion, and see what other people's
thoughts on the matter are. Thanks for your help!