[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: s_addr may be a bit field (ITS#340)
At 11:39 PM 10/29/99 GMT, email@example.com wrote:
>Full_Name: Keith Thompson
>OS: UNICOS/mk 126.96.36.199
>Submission from: (NULL) (188.8.131.52)
>The provided patch changes references to the address of an s_addr member to
>the address of the enclosing structure, which gives the same result on all
>systems I've been able to check.
Can we not also use the sizeof the enclosing structure?
See latest devel codes for patches along these lines.
Kurt D. Zeilenga <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Net Boolean Incorporated <http://www.boolean.net/>