[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: problems under IRIX 6.2, 6.5
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> At 02:07 PM 1/20/99 -0500, Don Badrak wrote:
> >I've been investigating quite a bit more on this problem (see the archives
> >for the full details). To summarize: OpenLDAP 1.1.2 is horrendously slow
> >under IRIX 6.2 and 6.5, while performing just fine under Linux 2.0.36
> >and Solaris 2.6.
> >Lots of things were blamed, one being the read/write locks. So, today
> >I ripped out all the read/write entry locks. Still the same thing. That
> >wasn't very helpful.
> That's a relief for us at least. I was dreading having to reengineer
> that code.
Well, me too, as it appears that it works just fine. I did find another
read/write lock implementation (from an Addison-Wesley book) I was going
to give a try. It has more stuff than the one from the O'Reilly book,
including separate variables for reading and writing. I still intend on
> >[ snipped ]
> > access to dn=".*,ou=People,o=U.S. Census Bureau,c=US"
> > by self write
> > by * read
> >Aha. Has anything major changed in the acl code (since the original Umich?).
> The ACL code has been significantly reworked since Umich days.
> First, OpenLDAP uses POSIX regex instead of the older
> BSD re_comp/_exec() codes. Not all implementations of POSIX
> regex are created equally. You might want to experiment with
> alternative implementations (GNU or Spencer's).
Apparently not. I just tried the GNU one (regex-0.12). With the SGI one
(default) I got 6.30 seconds for the query. When I removed the ACL listed
above, that dropped down to 0.60 seconds, and after running it a couple
times, I got 0.35 seconds. I just popped the GNU library there, and got
0.21 seconds without the ACL, and 0.65 seconds *including* the
problem-ACL. Seems the GNU one is way faster, and the SGI one has some
That's still a pretty impressive change for the existing ACLs.
> Second major change is the ACL group support.
> >It may be something with the IRIX regex stuff, but I'm not sure. I will
> >try the GNU regex library to see how that goes. One thing I noticed in
> >servers/slapd/acl.c was the removal of the mutex on the regex_matches()
> >call. Hmm.
> The POSIX API is such that the mutex is not needed.
Ok, I'll undo all that stuff.
> >I shall keep investigating. Any ideas anyone?
> I'm sure the ACL code could be optimized a bit. We problably
> should investigate precompiling the regular expressions. I
> posted a note on -devel.
I saw that. I think I'll give it a whirl, if I can squeeze some time out
of my schedule (this stuff isn't even part of my job). Looks Like I could
learn something about all this code, CVS, and even contribute :-)
> >Time to tackle the next problem -- why does making a new database (set of
> >files) using ldif2ldbm take 45 minutes under IRIX but only 3 minutes on
> >my Linux machine? (well, I have it down to 9 minutes now, but it's still
> >too long)
> Assuming you're using the same version of OpenLDAP with same underlying
> datastore, I have no clue. You could eliminate threading as a issue
> completely by compiling --without-threads.
I could, but I'm not sure what that will buy. I will give it a try and
post the results. ldbmcat also gives me nothing. From the looks of it,
these tools haven't been touched in a while (the Makefile still says
Don Badrak <email@example.com> 301.457.1793 work
Telecommunications Office 301.457.4438 fax
U.S. Bureau of the Census 301.457.1828 fax
Suitland MD, USA