[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: [ldapext] UTF-8 full support in LDIF / LDIF v2
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
Extending LDIF to support XML values.
Really ?
See http://www.xmled.info/drafts/draft-sciberras-xed-eldif-05.txt
Interesting, I think this is a valid issue, although I think XML is the
wrong solution. Any reason why the draft never made it to an RFC ?
What other solutions could be used to make multi-line entries ?
Would quoting a la python work, or would that add too much complexity, too
much of a change from the current LDIF ?
I think the ASCII I-D/RFC needs to have examples that use some sort of
escaping mechanism (for the purposes of the example)
value: \C3\BC
where C3 BC is the 2 octet UTF-8 encoding of the Unicode LATIN SMALL
LETTER U WITH DIAERESIS (U+00FC) codepoint.
value: \75\CC\88
Thanks, I'll look at that. Anybody knows of an RFC that use something like
this in their example, from the top of your head ?
--
Yves.
http://www.sollers.ca/
_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext