Re: [ldapext] Summary of group discussion

To: Ludovic Poitou <Ludovic.Poitou@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Summary of group discussion
From: Pete Rowley <prowley@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:15:09 -0700
Cc: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>, LDAP Extensions list <ldapext@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <598D2001-BB82-434D-9571-0B2F140303EE@sun.com>
References: <20070924194342.GA9926@tile.skills-1st.co.uk> <46F86C11.8080203@highlandsun.com> <598D2001-BB82-434D-9571-0B2F140303EE@sun.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061215)

Ludovic Poitou wrote:

So, yes, it would be really nice to see some harmonization in that space.

Very cool, I agree.

I recently wrote a memberof plugin for FDS that currently supports static groups only. Definitely a good idea to standardize this I think.

--
Pete

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

References:
- [ldapext] Summary of group discussion
  - From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>
- Re: [ldapext] Summary of group discussion
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@highlandsun.com>
- Re: [ldapext] Summary of group discussion
  - From: Ludovic Poitou <Ludovic.Poitou@Sun.COM>