Re: [ldapext] LDAP BoF at IETF#69?

[Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com>]

There has been insufficient interest shown in holding an LDAP BoF at
IETF#69 and, hence, I won't be putting together a formal BoF proposal  
for
AD/IESG consideration.  I will be attending IETF#69 anyways and would be
happy to met with LDAP'ers informally (e.g., at the bar) to discussion
any on-going / future LDAP work.

-- Kurt

On May 5, 2007, at 5:25 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:

> It seems to me that it might be appropriate to organize a BoF (bar  
> or actual)
> at IETF#69 to discuss specification and standardization of various  
> LDAP
> extensions, determine whether a WG is needed/desired to further this
> engineering, and, if so, rough out a charter proposal.
>
> Some work candidates (in no particular order):
>
> Internet Naming Plan (update)
> Distributed Operations (chaining)
> Distributed Authentication
> Use of DNS in Internet directories (DNS SRV)
> Password Policy administrative model and notifications
> Transactions
> DAP/LDAP alignment
> Regular Expression Matching Rule
>
> If there is sufficient interested shown on this list (and  
> elsewhere), I
> would be willing to put together a BoF proposal for AD/IESG  
> consideration.
> So, please let your views on whether such a BoF should be held known.
>
> You're also more than welcomed to name other work candidates, and  
> comment
> on those that I enumerated.
>
> Also, those willing to serve as a BOF chair should drop me a note.
>
> Regards, Kurt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext