Strange, I fixed this and indeed it's fixed in the newly published I-D's, but the I-D ACTION messages have the old text. So if you see it in the I-D ACTION announcement, don't be alarmed.
Jim
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com> 1/6/05 8:35:27 AM >>> Must have been daydreaming. Thanks for the catch.
Jim >>> Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> 1/5/05 2:18:02 PM >>> I've just noticed that lots of places call LDAP the Lightweight Directory *Application* Protocol instead of *Access* protocol, including: - RFC 2820 (Access Control Requirements for LDAP), - draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-08.txt (Access Control Model for LDAPv3), - draft-sermersheim-ldap-subordinate-scope-01.txt (Subordinate Subtree Search Scope for LDAP), - draft-sermersheim-ldap-distproc-01.txt (Distributed Procedures for LDAP Operations). -- Hallvard _______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext |
_______________________________________________ Ldapext mailing list Ldapext@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext