Subject
| From
| # of followups
|
---|
larger stock returns
| Nora Westbrook
| 0
|
ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder
| mailman-owner
| 0
|
ietf.org mailing list memberships reminder
| mailman-owner
| 0
|
cardiology, radiology,
| Regina Cornett
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Alexandre PAUZIES
| 2
|
Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Steven Legg
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] draft-pauzies-ldap-schema-nonascii-mr-00.txt
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 0
|
doctors,physicians,& American doctors directoty
| Suzette Poe
| 0
|
FW: Mórtgage Application
| Jaime Dempsey
| 0
|
The Results of Your Survey
| Shelby Cohen
| 0
|
[ldapext] draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-java-api-19.txt
| Steve Sonntag
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] draft-ietf-ldapext-ldap-java-api-19.txt
| Steve Sonntag
| 0
|
2004 doctors American directoty,physicians,
| Suzanne Oneal
| 0
|
[ldapext] LDIFv2
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 1
|
PLEASE ASSIST TRANSFER.
| o_kenneth
| 0
|
[ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] subtree search with glue entries
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
[ldapext] RE: [XEDDEV] LDIFv2
| Andrew Sciberras
| 0
|
Status: Approved
| Deanna Street
| 0
|
[ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| John McMeeking
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| Hallvard B Furuseth
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] New I-D: 'untypedObject' object class
| John McMeeking
| 0
|
[ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Application Form Accepted
| Carolyn Burke
| 0
|
university degrees for sale here
| Leticia Macdonald
| 0
|
Re: kong diagnostic
| Dannie
| 0
|
Your confirm code is: #M854
| Angelo Stevenson
| 0
|
Economy is much better now
| Dominique Contreras
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
[no subject]
| Alison
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] exclusions versus alreadySearched
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Pre-Qualified M[o]rtgage Application
| Dina Dukes
| 0
|
lime
| Mccain
| 0
|
Re:
| Etta
| 0
|
Re: disdainful lovelorn
| Dominique
| 0
|
Incredible Software Deals. berenices sabra coed condemnate
| Charity Hodges
| 0
|
[ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 3
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Application Approved
| Chris Vera
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: orphic bloop
| Adeline
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
[ldapext] superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
ref DN != reference name (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
[ldapext] Re: superior of subrDSE while chaining a resolved operation
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: ref DN != reference name (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
Re: Purpose of unableToProceed (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: Need for operationProgress (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ennis, Mark
| 0
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 0
|
[ldapext] ChainedOperation.targetObject (are nssr's required)?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
[ldapext] searchable archive?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Mark Ennis
| 1
|
RE: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Ramsay, Ron
| 1
|
[ldapext] Distributed Procedures Requirements
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?)
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] searchable archive?
| Mark Smith
| 0
|
Re: [ldapext] searchable archive?
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
chaining binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|
Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Jim Sermersheim
| 1
|
Re: chaining SASL binds (Was: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| Kurt D. Zeilenga
| 0
|
Re: Proxied AuthZ (was: Re: [ldapext] Chained Operation (control, extended op, or op?))
| John McMeeking
| 0
|
[ldapext] Is exclude subtree useful outside of chained operations?
| Jim Sermersheim
| 0
|