[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [ldapext] Re: FW: Active Directory question

At 08:07 PM 4/15/2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
>This is an example of, amongst other things, a horribly
>designed LDAP extension.  It's most serious flaw is that
>the extension is truly non-optional.  If the server
>elects to implement this extension, so must its clients
>(if they want to get all available values).

BTW, there numerous other problems with this extension,
such as prescribing use of invalid attribute descriptions
(options cannot contain '='), but I consider these minor
in comparison to being truly non-optional.

Kurt 


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext