Re: [ldapext] VLV: a particular target entry

["David Boreham" <david_list@boreham.org>]

> If every entry in the client's current view has vanished, you would just
> attempt a re-position based on their current requested offset. They
> would end up in a place that may or may not be confusing.

Indeed.

> In my mind, for this particular issue, there doesn't need to be any
> change to the VLV protocol. Only clarifications and further notes to
> implementers.

My point was that there is no general solution to the
dynamic list content problem, only various suggestions
to make it not so bad, in the abstract, with no cited
application where the problem has proven to arise in the
first place.



_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext