Re: [ldapext] VLV: a particular target entry

["David Boreham" <david_list@boreham.org>]

> Do you not see that VLV is broken without selection by DN.
> That is, the VLV scroll up/down mechanism fails in the
> general case, e.g. when content is unstable.

Highly unstable content isn't within the scope of this
protocol. Directories typically don't have highly unstable
content.

> This isn't about a NEW feature.  It's about scrolling
> that works.

Strangely, the existing protocol has been 'working' for
many folks for many years. AFAIK in the IETF culture,
working interoperable implementations are considered
something of an advantage vs theoretical complaints.

Kurt: do you have a counterexample ? e.g. something
you tried to implement with the current protocol but failed 
to get to work ? Tell us about it.



_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext