[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Last call on 'Named Subordinate References in LDAPDirectories'

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: Last call on 'Named Subordinate References in LDAPDirectories'
From: mcs@netscape.com (Mark C Smith)
Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 10:32:18 -0400
Cc: roland@catalogix.se, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Organization: iPlanet E-Commerce Solutions
References: <0104231956560D.00916@t20> <5.1.0.14.0.20010507204841.00aa1370@127.0.0.1>

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" wrote:
>
> But, as there are client implementations take different views of
> what RFC 2251 examples suggests, I would suggest that namedref
> require that returned continuation LDAP URLs always contain an
> explicit scope.

I think that is the best solution.

-Mark

References:
- Re: Last call on 'Named Subordinate References in LDAP Directories'
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Last call on 'Named Subordinate References in LDAPDirectories'
Next by Date: Re: To slash or not to slash (Was: Last Call on namedref)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread