[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: protecting dns in the ACM

To: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>
Subject: Re: protecting dns in the ACM
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 13:58:26 -0700
Cc: Richard V Huber <rvh@qsun.mt.att.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <3AD5AE2A.177EFE7B@Sun.COM>
References: <200104111950.PAA21762@qsun.mt.att.com>

At 03:31 PM 4/12/01 +0200, robert byrne wrote:
>Although it's not part of the ACM it's probably worth recalling that
>aliasing is an additional mechanism for ptotecting dns.

I don't understand this statement.  How does aliasing protect DNs?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: protecting dns in the ACM
  - From: Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@sun.com>

References:
- Re: protecting dns in the ACM
  - From: rvh@qsun.mt.att.com (Richard V Huber)
- Re: protecting dns in the ACM
  - From: robert byrne <robert.byrne@Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: EARN $1000 EVERY TIME SOMEONE SPENDS $89! [jyyqd]
Next by Date: Customer Care Center 22227
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread