An attribute type can not, should not be both userApplication and operational usages.
Why not?
While I don't necessarily object to a syntax extension, I would object to overloading the ldapACI attribute type with userApplication usage.
At 10:33 AM 2/20/01 -0800, Bruce Greenblatt wrote:
>As promised, attached are my proposed modifications to the ACL draft to support application defined permissions.
>
>Bruce
>