[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: draft Java-api-12

To: Rob Weltman <robw@worldspot.com>
Subject: Re: draft Java-api-12
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:51:15 -0800
Cc: Steve Sonntag <VTAG@novell.com>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <3A23E0B1.EEFEB1C0@worldspot.com>
References: <sa2279eb.090@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com>

At 08:43 AM 11/28/00 -0800, Rob Weltman wrote:
>It might be better instead to eliminate the current unsolicited notification methods and instead have methods to add and remove listeners for usolicited notifications. The implementation can then discard unsolicited notifications if there are no listeners. For example (I haven't thought this through completely yet): 

When using the low level ("asynchronous") API, unsolicited
notifications can (and should) be handled just like any other
response message.  I do agree that the higher level ("synchronous")
API which needs some reworking.

References:
- Re: draft Java-api-12
  - From: Rob Weltman <robw@worldspot.com>

Prev by Date: Re: draft Java-api-12
Next by Date: Re: draft Java-api-12
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread