Re: RE: Solicitation for review (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining-00.txt)

["Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@novell.com>]

I wouldn't mind adding some scoping choices if we can define a good set of scopes. Would you prefer that the draft describe the semantics of the scoping choices or leave them as implementation-specific?

>>> "Volpers, Helmut" <helmut.volpers@icn.siemens.de> 11/23/00 01:30 AM >>>
Hi Jim,
 
I like the idea of defining a control to enable an LDAP Client to say to a
Server
whether the server should chain or return referrals if references exist.
I understand you correct that you don't want to define distributed
operations ?
I will review your draft in detail. At the moment I think we need something
like
"scope of referral" to limit the scope where the Server chain to e.g. my
local
domain or my country etc.
Who will define the OID's for the control.
Do you present the draft in San Diego ?
 
Helmut

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Sermersheim [mailto:JIMSE@novell.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 21. November 2000 18:39
To: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Subject: Solicitation for review (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining-00.txt)


This draft describes a control to be used to specify chaining behavior.
 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining-00.txt
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining-00.txt>

 
Review and feedback via this list is appreciated.
 
Thanks.
 
Jim