[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: is LDAP-server-finding ldapext or lsd?
The LSD WG is no longer active.
Chris.
RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
> Ryan Moats wrote:
>
> > This draft replaces draft-moats-ldap-taxonomy-00 as this is now a
> > working group item.
>
> Perhaps someone who was in Oslo (since as far as I can tell there have
> been no ldapext minutes published, and only a one-paragraph version of
> lsd; nudge-nudge) can tell the rest of us about the disposition of the
> finding-ldap-servers topic. I see that the SRV records topic was on the
> ldapext agenda.
>
> It seems to me that if lsd were a flourishing WG, this topic would be
> squarely in its camp; and that putting it into ldapext likely will take
> some substantial motivation away from actually having a lsd WG. This may
> not be a bad thing, but it would be nice to know what (if anything) was
> discussed about the relations among this work item and these two
> (one real and one potential) WGs.
>
> - RL "Bob"
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Apple Business Site: AnyWho Directory Service
Internet Directory Group http://www.anywho.com
AT&T Labs
capple@control.att.com
+1 973 236 6470 Tired of slow directories? Try AnyWho.
------------------------------------------------------------------------