[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: object class 'alias'

To: Mark Wahl <M.Wahl@INNOSOFT.COM>, Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>
Subject: Re: object class 'alias'
From: Harald Alvestrand <Harald@Alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 17:35:26 +0200
Cc: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>, ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
In-reply-to: <18738.931782801@threadgill.austin.innosoft.com>
References: <"Your message of Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:04:51 PDT." <3.0.6.32.19990712000451.00919db0@pop.walltech.com>
Resent-date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 00:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"tyXd6D.A.nF.d4Dj3"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

At 07:33 12.07.99 -0500, Mark Wahl wrote:

My mistake in 2252: alias is not abstract.  Thanks for finding this , Kurt.
In the next release section 4.4 will read

   In general every entry will contain an abstract class ("top"),
   at least one structural object class, and zero or more auxiliary
   object classes.


Does this mean that all objects of type "alias" are also of type "top"?

                 Harald

--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.no

Follow-Ups:
- Re: object class 'alias'
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.Org>
- Re: object class 'alias'
  - From: Erik Skovgaard <eskovgaard@geotrain.com>

References:
- Re: object class 'alias'
  - From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@dtasi.com>
- Re: object class 'alias'
  - From: Mark Wahl <M.Wahl@INNOSOFT.COM>

Prev by Date: Mortgage Processing Software
Next by Date: RE: Ignore ing
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread