[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt

To: dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham), ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt
From: Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:06:42 -0700
Cc: Steve.Kille@messagingdirect.com
In-reply-to: <37712FC1.39A213B3@netscape.com>
Resent-date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 09:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Resent-from: ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Resent-message-id: <"sXXpVD.A.Y4G.belc3"@glacier>
Resent-sender: ietf-ldapext-request@netscape.com

I would like for it to be the case that if a server supports this
attribute, then it MUST support it for all entries in the DIT on that
server.  Is there a problem with adding this conformance requirement?

Bruce
================================================
Bruce Greenblatt             
bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com
http://www.directory-applications.com
================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt
  - From: dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)

References:
- draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt
  - From: dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)

Prev by Date: Re: agenda?
Next by Date: Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread