Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-00.txt

[dboreham@netscape.com (David Boreham)]

Jim Sermersheim wrote:
> 
> Good idea.  Could the draft be more explicit about the meaning of "subordinates"?  I think you mean the number of "one-level" of subordinates but some might assume it means the whole subtree.

Indeed, it's the immediate subordinates, or one-level
subordinates. 

But hmm. I spent some time trying to invent words
and examples which would make this clear in the
document. Obviously I failed :)