[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ActiveDirectory schema


Erik Skovgaard wrote:

> For whatever it is worth, nor is OK to create funny non-standard Structural
> Object Classes (i.e. inetOrgPerson) that people get tempted to use instead
> of the basic ones.  All extensions to the standard schema should be Aux.
> Object Classes, IMHO.  Or else there's only pain to gain.

For the X.500 challenged among us, could you tell us
the difference between "structural" and "aux" object classes
please ?