Re: Latest Signed Directory Operations draft (and maybe WG last call)

[Bruce Greenblatt <bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com>]

Oops.  I hadn't seen the new guidelines.  I'll get an update out later
today.  Thanks,

Bruce

At 12:06 PM 2/8/99 -0500, Cynthia Clark wrote:
>
>Bruce,
>
>I was going to work on your newly revised Internet-Draft
><draft-ietf-ldapext-sigops-04.txt>, but I have to remove
>it from the directory temporarily.
>
>Since your Internet-Draft does not comply with our
>requirements (with the newly updated boilerplate),
>please check the new template:
>
>        http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt
>
>All Internet-Drafts should begin with ONE of the following three
>statements:
>
>        This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
>        with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026.
>
>        This document is an Internet-Draft and is in full conformance
>        with all provisions of Section 10 of RFC2026 except for the
>        right to produce derivative works.
>
>        This document is an Internet-Draft and is NOT offered in
>        accordance with Section 10 of RFC2026, and will only exist as
>        an Internet-Draft.
>
>Any submission which does not include one (and only one) of the above
>three statements will be returned to the submitter. I look forward to
>receive your re-submission.
>
>Regards,
>Cynthia
>------------------------------------------------------
>Cynthia Clark, IETF Internet-Drafts Publisher
>E-mail Address preference:  <cclark@ietf.org>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
================================================
Bruce Greenblatt             
bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com
http://www.directory-applications.com
================================================