the change log draft and the signed directory operations draft

[Bruce Greenblatt <bruceg@innetix.com>]

As I see it, these two drafts  have significant overlaps.  They both
present object classes that are designed to represent changes that have
been applied to a directory entry.  Do we need both of these? The signed
directory operations draft provides a way to have the journal of changes
signed by either the client or server, at the expense of the overhead of
creating a signed object.  I think that we need only one approach.  Does
the group think that the journal of changes needs to have the ability to be
signed?  What should we do?

Bruce
================================================
Bruce Greenblatt              bruceg@innetix.com
http://www.innetix.com/~bruceg
================================================